The Internal Revenue Service has updated its voluntary disclosure procedures for taxpayers with previously undisclosed funds, instituting tougher procedures.
IRS deputy commissioner for services and enforcement Kirsten Wielobob issued a memorandum last week that the IRS posted publicly Thursday, outlining the process for all voluntary disclosures following the closing of the IRS’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program on Sept. 28, 2018. She noted in the memo that the 2014 OVDP began as a modified version of the OVDP that launched in 2012 after earlier programs in 2009 and 2011. “These programs were designed for taxpayers with exposure to potential criminal liability or substantial civil penalties due to a willful failure to report foreign financial assets and pay all tax due in respect of those assets,” she wrote. “They provided taxpayers with such exposure potential protection from criminal liability and terms for resolving their civil tax and penalty obligations.”
The new procedures are effective for all disclosures after Sept. 28, 2018. The penalties have grown steadily stiffer for taxpayers who continue to hide their funds in foreign bank accounts, and the latest version of the program may give taxpayers and tax practitioners pause.
“Under the new procedures, taxpayers will find that the cost of making a disclosure has increased,” commented Barbara Kaplan, a tax attorney and shareholder at the law firm Greenberg Traurig, in an email from the firm. “A number of things have changed: the number of years for the program, the application of penalties, a right to go to Appeals to contest the IRS findings after examination, the making of the offshore and domestic programs the same and the requirement to include an explanatory narrative. It also appears that the examination phase is more like a true IRS audit than just a compliance review.”
A fraud penalty, and a willful FBAR penalty for offshore cases where taxpayers intentionally failed to file a foreign bank account report, will now be applied to one of the six years of the disclosure period, or less if the noncompliance occurred over a shorter period of time, she noted.
“Additional civil penalties can be expected,” Kaplan wrote in an email. “CI [IRS Criminal Investigation] will continue to screen all disclosures to determine if a taxpayer is eligible to make the disclosure. Once pre-clearance is granted, the taxpayer will have to disclose the nature of the non-compliance, including a narrative providing facts and circumstances, assets, entities and any related parties or professional advisors involved in the noncompliance.”
That could have an impact on tax professionals who have advised taxpayers who have been hiding their funds. But taxpayers and their representatives will have to weigh the pros and cons of the new procedures.
“The amended or delinquent returns will be examined and, at the end of the process, it is expected that an agreement will be reached,” said Kaplan. “Cooperation with the civil examination is required and, if not given, could lead to revocation of preliminary acceptance into the program. At the end of the day, taxpayers who afford themselves of this process will be relieved of criminal exposure but not the civil ramifications. For those who do not have criminal exposure, this program should not be used.”
Showing posts with label Benefits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Benefits. Show all posts
Friday, November 30, 2018
Friday, August 17, 2018
Top five tax planning opportunities for individuals in 2018
As we enter into the tax
planning stage of the year, the focus shifts to helping clients understand the
impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and optimize their tax positions. That is
no small task, given that there are over 130 new tax provisions.
No. 5 — Itemized deductions
versus the standard deduction
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
roughly doubles the standard deduction. This means that for 2018, joint filers
can enjoy a standard deduction of $24,000. However, the new law suspends
personal exemption deductions and eliminates or limits many of the itemized
deductions. For example, the state and local tax deduction is now capped at
$10,000 per year, or $5,000 for a married taxpayer filing separately. Also, the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act temporarily eliminates miscellaneous itemized deductions
subject to the 2 percent floor (like tax preparation fees and employee business
expenses) and limits the home mortgage interest deduction to home acquisition
debt of up to $750,000, or $375,000 for a married taxpayer filing separately.
So, what does this mean for tax
payers? For those who typically claim the standard deduction, chances are their
tax bill will decrease for 2018. Although personal exemption deductions are no
longer available, a larger standard deduction, combined with lower tax rates
and an increased child tax credit, may result in less tax. Also, you may find
that clients who itemized last year won’t itemize this year, or they may be
able to itemize for state income tax purposes but not for federal. You will
need to run the numbers to assess the impact for each client. Depending on the
results, you may need to adjust your clients’ estimated quarterly tax payments
or encourage them to turn in a new Form W-4 to their employers.
No. 4 — Revisit your qualified
tuition plans
Qualified tuition plans, also
called 529 plans, are a great way to ease the financial burden of paying for
college. Before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, earnings in a 529 plan could be
withdrawn tax-free only when used for qualified higher education at colleges,
universities, vocational schools or other post-secondary schools. Thanks to the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, 529 plans can now be used to pay for tuition at an
elementary or secondary public, private or religious school, up to $10,000 per
year. If your clients are paying tuition for their children or grandchildren to
attend elementary or secondary schools, encourage them to either set up or
revisit their 529 plans. They’ll thank you for it later.
No. 3 — Watch out for home
equity debt interest
Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,
home equity debt interest is no longer deductible. Or so you thought. According
to the IRS, interest paid on home equity loans and lines of credit is
deductible if the funds were used to buy or substantially improve the home that
secures the loan. In other words, it’s treated as home acquisition debt subject
to the new $750,000/$375,000 limit. This is good news for homeowners, but it
forces you to trace how the proceeds were used. If your client used the cash to
pay off credit card or other personal debts, the interest isn’t deductible,
even if the payoff occurred prior to 2018.
No. 2 — Bunch charitable contributions
The new law temporarily
increases the limit on cash contributions to public charities and certain
private foundations from 50 to 60 percent of adjusted gross income. However,
the doubling of the standard deduction and changes to key itemized deductions
will prevent some clients from itemizing in 2018 and therefore benefiting from
this increased limit. One way to combat this is to bunch or increase charitable
contributions in alternating years. Suggest that clients set up donor-advised
funds. This will allow them to claim a charitable tax deduction in the funding
year and schedule grants over the next two years or other multiyear periods.
Clients can take advantage of the deduction when they’re at a higher marginal
tax rate while actual payouts from the fund can be deferred until later. It’s a
win-win situation.
No. 1 — Maximize the qualified
business income deduction
Perhaps the hottest topic of the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is the new qualified business income deduction under
Section 199A. Individuals who own interests in a sole proprietorship,
partnership, LLC, or S corporation may be able to deduct up to 20 percent of
their qualified business income. However, the deduction is subject to various
rules and limitations.
Although the final official
guidance is lacking on this new deduction, there are some planning strategies
that can be considered now. For example, clients can adjust their business’s
W-2 wages to maximize the deduction. Also, it may be beneficial for clients to
convert their independent contractors to employees where possible, but make
sure the benefit of the deduction outweighs the increased payroll tax burden
and cost of providing employee benefits. Other planning strategies include
investing in short-lived depreciable assets, restructuring the business,
leasing and selling property between businesses, and, yes, even getting
married.
Thursday, August 9, 2018
Las 6 economías que crecerán más y menos en América Latina en 2018
Este debería ser un buen año para Latinoamérica en lo que se refiere a crecimiento económico.
Aunque sus pronósticos no son idénticos, varios organismos internacionales han proyectado que el Producto Interno Bruto (PIB) regional aumentará: un 2% según el Banco Mundial (BM); un 1,9% según el FMI y un 2,2% según la CEPAL.
"La economía de la región se encuentra en el medio de una franca recuperación, luego de dos años de crecimiento negativo. Sin embargo, aún enfrenta riesgos y desafíos en el corto y largo plazo", le dijo a BBC Mundo Carlos Arteta, economista jefe del BM.
Según el informe de esta organización titulado "Perspectivas Económicas Mundiales", el fortalecimiento del consumo y la inversión privada, especialmente en países exportadores de productos básicos, impulsarán el crecimiento regional.
En este escenario, la recuperación de Brasil -que representa 40% del PIB regional- es uno de los factores más importantes.
"Una mejora gradual en el precio de productos básicos y una menor incertidumbre en materia de política económica, ayudarán a la recuperación de la inversión en la región", agregó Arteta.
Además, se prevé que el repunte de la economía mundial y la demanda de materias primas por parte de China, beneficien a las exportaciones regionales.
La investigación del BM también proyecta que Brasil repuntará este año con un crecimiento de 2%, en la medida que mejores condiciones laborales y baja inflación, impulsen el consumo privado. También ese repunte depende de que desaparezcan los efectos residuales de la recesión y que exista un mayor respaldo a la inversión.
En el caso de México, el otro gigante regional, el organismo prevé un crecimiento de 2,1%, porque espera que se produzca una recuperación en las inversiones, aunque mucho dependerá de cómo evolucione la incertidumbre en torno al futuro del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte y al resultado de las elecciones presidenciales de julio.
"Una mayor incertidumbre política en países como Brasil, Guatemala y Perú podría frenar el crecimiento", dijo Arteta, ya que podría afectar la confianza de los agentes económicos.
Aunque sus pronósticos no son idénticos, varios organismos internacionales han proyectado que el Producto Interno Bruto (PIB) regional aumentará: un 2% según el Banco Mundial (BM); un 1,9% según el FMI y un 2,2% según la CEPAL.
"La economía de la región se encuentra en el medio de una franca recuperación, luego de dos años de crecimiento negativo. Sin embargo, aún enfrenta riesgos y desafíos en el corto y largo plazo", le dijo a BBC Mundo Carlos Arteta, economista jefe del BM.
Según el informe de esta organización titulado "Perspectivas Económicas Mundiales", el fortalecimiento del consumo y la inversión privada, especialmente en países exportadores de productos básicos, impulsarán el crecimiento regional.
En este escenario, la recuperación de Brasil -que representa 40% del PIB regional- es uno de los factores más importantes.
"Una mejora gradual en el precio de productos básicos y una menor incertidumbre en materia de política económica, ayudarán a la recuperación de la inversión en la región", agregó Arteta.
Además, se prevé que el repunte de la economía mundial y la demanda de materias primas por parte de China, beneficien a las exportaciones regionales.
La investigación del BM también proyecta que Brasil repuntará este año con un crecimiento de 2%, en la medida que mejores condiciones laborales y baja inflación, impulsen el consumo privado. También ese repunte depende de que desaparezcan los efectos residuales de la recesión y que exista un mayor respaldo a la inversión.
En el caso de México, el otro gigante regional, el organismo prevé un crecimiento de 2,1%, porque espera que se produzca una recuperación en las inversiones, aunque mucho dependerá de cómo evolucione la incertidumbre en torno al futuro del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte y al resultado de las elecciones presidenciales de julio.
"Una mayor incertidumbre política en países como Brasil, Guatemala y Perú podría frenar el crecimiento", dijo Arteta, ya que podría afectar la confianza de los agentes económicos.
Tuesday, August 7, 2018
FASB updates accounting for leasing standard
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an accounting standards update Monday to reduce cost and ease implementation of the leasing standard for financial statement preparers.
The ASU simplifies transition requirements. For lessors, it also provides a practical expedient for the separation of non-lease components from lease components.
The update also provides an option to apply the transition provisions of the new standard at its adoption date, instead of at the earliest comparative period presented in its financial statements; and a practical expedient that permits lessors to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component if certain conditions are met.
“The targeted improvements in the ASU address areas our stakeholders identified as sources of unnecessary cost or complexity in the leases standard,” said FASB Chairman Russell Golden in a statement. “They represent the FASB’s commitment to proactively address implementation issues raised by our stakeholders to ensure a successful transition to the new standard without compromising the quality of information provided to investors.”
The ASU simplifies transition requirements. For lessors, it also provides a practical expedient for the separation of non-lease components from lease components.
The update also provides an option to apply the transition provisions of the new standard at its adoption date, instead of at the earliest comparative period presented in its financial statements; and a practical expedient that permits lessors to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component if certain conditions are met.
“The targeted improvements in the ASU address areas our stakeholders identified as sources of unnecessary cost or complexity in the leases standard,” said FASB Chairman Russell Golden in a statement. “They represent the FASB’s commitment to proactively address implementation issues raised by our stakeholders to ensure a successful transition to the new standard without compromising the quality of information provided to investors.”
Saturday, July 21, 2018
Senate panel advances IRS commissioner and introduces IRS reform bill
A closely divided Senate Finance Committee advanced the nominee for the next Internal Revenue Service commissioner, Charles Rettig, by a vote of 14 to 13, but he awaits a vote by the full Senate.
Rettig is a tax attorney at the Beverly Hills law firm Hochman, Salkin, Rettig, Toscher & Perez, P.C. who has spent most of his career representing clients before the IRS. If he is confirmed by the full Senate, he would succeed acting commissioner David Kautter, who is also the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy. Kautter has been acting commissioner since the end of John Koskinen’s term last November. Rettig would be coming in at a time when the IRS is dealing with the massive tax cuts law that Congress passed last December.
“For the IRS to implement the biggest tax overhaul in a generation, it is essential that the agency is fully staffed and led by a strong, capable commissioner,” said Senate Finance Committee chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, in a statement. “The job of commissioner is further complicated by years of mistrust and scandals at the agency. Chuck Rettig is the right pick to both implement tax reform and restore trust in the IRS. I am pleased that the committee advanced his nomination, and I look forward to the Senate acting quickly on his nomination so he can get started on the hefty tasks he will be charged with as the agency’s leader.”
However, Democrats on the committee voted against confirming Rettig, in part as a protest against the IRS and the Treasury Department’s decision this week to let 501(c)4 tax-exempt organizations, such as political action groups, avoid listing the names of their donors (see Many political tax-exempts no longer required to report donors).
“The Trump administration has taken a qualified nominee and dumped him right in the middle of a dark-money political firestorm of their own creation,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., the ranking Democrat on the committee. “And a radical change in tax law regarding transparency and disclosure has dragged the IRS and Treasury into a swirling set of questions about the president’s foreign financial ties and motivations. As a result, this nomination is no longer an isolated debate that can begin without context.”
Despite their differences, Hatch and Wyden agreed to introduce bipartisan legislation Thursday aimed at reforming some of the IRS’s administrative practices, echoing legislation that already passed the House in April.
The Taxpayer First Act is also based on two 114th Congress bills (S. 3156 and S. 3157) that passed the Finance Committee unanimously in 2016. It aims to increase taxpayer protections and electronic filing; enhance whistleblower protections; reform policies concerning IRS employees; increase scrutiny of IRS audit criteria; and support prevention of identity theft and tax refund fraud.
“Ensuring the IRS has greater flexibility and bringing it into the 21st century continues to be a top priority – especially with the largest rewrite of the tax code in more than three decades on the books,” Hatch said in a statement. “We’ve been working hand in glove with the administration to ensure a proper and seamless implementation of new policies and are confident this bill will streamline the agency in a way that protects taxpayers from fraud and abuse, increases electronic filing and supports IRS employees.”
“With every passing day there’s a new headline about hackers and crooks stealing taxpayer dollars and personal data,” Wyden stated. “Congress must do more to protect American taxpayers from fraud and financial abuse. This bipartisan legislation will make common-sense changes to help taxpayers and streamline administrative rules at the IRS, which will allow tax officials and agents to better safeguard the American people against financial predators.”
Rettig is a tax attorney at the Beverly Hills law firm Hochman, Salkin, Rettig, Toscher & Perez, P.C. who has spent most of his career representing clients before the IRS. If he is confirmed by the full Senate, he would succeed acting commissioner David Kautter, who is also the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy. Kautter has been acting commissioner since the end of John Koskinen’s term last November. Rettig would be coming in at a time when the IRS is dealing with the massive tax cuts law that Congress passed last December.
“For the IRS to implement the biggest tax overhaul in a generation, it is essential that the agency is fully staffed and led by a strong, capable commissioner,” said Senate Finance Committee chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, in a statement. “The job of commissioner is further complicated by years of mistrust and scandals at the agency. Chuck Rettig is the right pick to both implement tax reform and restore trust in the IRS. I am pleased that the committee advanced his nomination, and I look forward to the Senate acting quickly on his nomination so he can get started on the hefty tasks he will be charged with as the agency’s leader.”
However, Democrats on the committee voted against confirming Rettig, in part as a protest against the IRS and the Treasury Department’s decision this week to let 501(c)4 tax-exempt organizations, such as political action groups, avoid listing the names of their donors (see Many political tax-exempts no longer required to report donors).
“The Trump administration has taken a qualified nominee and dumped him right in the middle of a dark-money political firestorm of their own creation,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., the ranking Democrat on the committee. “And a radical change in tax law regarding transparency and disclosure has dragged the IRS and Treasury into a swirling set of questions about the president’s foreign financial ties and motivations. As a result, this nomination is no longer an isolated debate that can begin without context.”
Despite their differences, Hatch and Wyden agreed to introduce bipartisan legislation Thursday aimed at reforming some of the IRS’s administrative practices, echoing legislation that already passed the House in April.
The Taxpayer First Act is also based on two 114th Congress bills (S. 3156 and S. 3157) that passed the Finance Committee unanimously in 2016. It aims to increase taxpayer protections and electronic filing; enhance whistleblower protections; reform policies concerning IRS employees; increase scrutiny of IRS audit criteria; and support prevention of identity theft and tax refund fraud.
“Ensuring the IRS has greater flexibility and bringing it into the 21st century continues to be a top priority – especially with the largest rewrite of the tax code in more than three decades on the books,” Hatch said in a statement. “We’ve been working hand in glove with the administration to ensure a proper and seamless implementation of new policies and are confident this bill will streamline the agency in a way that protects taxpayers from fraud and abuse, increases electronic filing and supports IRS employees.”
“With every passing day there’s a new headline about hackers and crooks stealing taxpayer dollars and personal data,” Wyden stated. “Congress must do more to protect American taxpayers from fraud and financial abuse. This bipartisan legislation will make common-sense changes to help taxpayers and streamline administrative rules at the IRS, which will allow tax officials and agents to better safeguard the American people against financial predators.”
Wednesday, June 6, 2018
Diez de los CEO hispanos más influyentes de Estados Unidos.
La
comunidad hispana en Estados Unidos crece día a día, en número de personas y en
la importancia que éstas adquieren en el mundo empresarial. El mayor acceso de
la comunidad hispana a la educación secundaria y universitaria ofrece al mundo
laboral miles de profesionales con gran preparación que, en muchas ocasiones,
llegan a formar parte de los consejos de
administración de algunas de las empresas más importantes del país.
El
puesto de Chief Executive Officer (CEO)en EEUU, equivalente al Director
Ejecutivo o Consejero Delegado encargado de la dirección, administración y
organización de la compañía, ya no es un cargo exclusivo de una nacionalidad.
Aquí
están diez de los CEO hispanos más destacados del momento:
1. Paul Díaz (Kindred Healthcare). Es CEO de
una de las mayores empresas del sector de la salud de Estados Unidos. La
empresa tiene presencia en 46 estados, con 76.000 empleados y unas ganancias de
6.000 millones de dólares anuales. Paul Díaz es además participante en
actividades de la Universidad George Washington, donde se graduó en Derecho.
2. Pedro Fábregas (Envoy Air). Dirige una de
las aerolíneas regionales más grandes del mundo. A su cargo tiene más de 14.000
personasque se encargan de que cada vuelo entre las 150 ciudades en las que
operan salga de manera perfecta. Es graduado por la Universidad del Sagrado Corazón de Puerto Rico y posteriormente
obtuvo un máster en la Universidad de Miami.
3.
George Paz (Express Scripts). A cargo de
una de las empresas más grandes de América, puede presumir de ser el CEO
hispano mejor pagado de todos ya que ha llegado a conseguir crecimientos del 30%
en un año. Asistió a la Universidad de Missouri y está caracterizado por su
dirección humilde y de decisiones consensuadas.
4.
Paul Raines (GameStop Corp.). Es el CEO de la compañía desde junio de 2010. La
compañía se dedica al software de videojuegos y entretenimiento, con más de
17.000 empleados y unos ingresos de 9.500 millones anuales.
5.
Carlos A. Rodríguez (Automatic Data Processing, Inc.). De origen cubano y con
una carrera y MBA en Harvard, es el CEO de uno de los proveedores de capital
humano y contratación más grande del mundo. Llevó a la compañía a ingresos de
11.000 millones de dólaresy trabajan en más de 125 países.
6.
Joseph Mario Molina (Molina Healthcare, Inc.). Egresado de Química de la
California State University y de Medicina por la Univeristy of Southern
California. La compañía que dirige fue
nombrada una de las 25 hispanas con más influencia en América y sirven a más
1,8 millones de personas. Se trata de una empresa familiar fundada en 1980 que
fue expandiéndose por todo Estados Unidos, desde California a los diez Estados
en los que ya se encuentra.
7.
Tony Jiménez (MicroTech). La empresa ofrece servicios de tecnología,
computación e integración de sistemas de redes en más de 100 proyectos
federales, con acceso a 2.500 vendedores y más de un millón de productos y
servicios de tecnología. Jiménez es el fundador de la empresa y ha sido
reconocido con varios premios y galardones como uno de los principales líderes
en la industria de la tecnología y uno de los hispanos más influyentes del
país.
8.
Andrés Ruzo (Link America), Nacido en Perú, Ruzo fundó Link America en 1994
empresa dedicada al suministro de soluciones logísticasinnovadoras y servicios
profesionales técnicos. En 2012 Link America fue reconocida como la primera
empresa de mayor crecimiento hispano en los EE.UU.
9.
Gerardo I. López (AMC Entretaiment Inc.). Desde 1920, AMC es una de las
compañías de salas de cine más grande de EEUU, con más de 300 salas en todos el
país. López ocupa su dirección desde marzo de 2009. Anteriormente ocupó el
cargo de Vicepresidente Ejecutivo de Starbucks Coffee Company. Es licenciado en
Marketing por la Universidad George Washington y MBA en Finanzas por la
Universidad de Harvard Business School.
10.
José Robles (USAA). Robles, nacido en Puerto Rico, es el presidente y director
ejecutivo de USAA, una de las principales empresas de servicios financieros de
Estados Unidos. Con sede en San Antonio (Texas) y con oficinas en todo Estados
Unidos y Europa, USAA posee y gestiona activos de 182.000 millones dólares.
Tuesday, June 5, 2018
GDPR can have an impact on U.S. accountants
The
European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation takes effect Friday, and it
could affect accountants and auditors, along with their clients, in the U.S.
Under
the GDPR, any company that gathers, monitors or manages the personal
information of EU residents will need to make drastic changes in how it gets
and stores the data. Companies in both Europe and the U.S. have been blitzing
consumers in recent weeks with emails about new user agreements and privacy
policies, while some U.S. businesses have announced they will need to exit the
European market.
“There’s
a lot of U.S. companies that are selling goods and services to individuals in
the EU, and there are many dotcom companies and ecommerce companies that have a
global footprint and are selling to people all over the world, even if their
employees and infrastructure are all in the United States,” said Jeffrey
Sanchez, security and privacy managing director at the global consulting firm
Protiviti. “Certainly GDPR applies to those organizations. GDPR also applies to
other brick and mortar companies that are selling goods and services, whether
it’s airplane parts, construction equipment, or a variety of finished products
in Europe, where GDPR is going to apply. The reach of GDPR is very broad. One
of the biggest changes between the previous privacy legislation and GDPR is
that GDPR applies to any company, regardless of where they’re physically
located if they’re selling goods and services to people inside the EU.”
Even
though the deadline for complying with the new rules is supposed to be Friday,
May 25, 2018, many businesses in the U.S. are only now hearing about the new
rules, and their accountants can help them get up to speed and audit their
compliance.
“Accountants
play lots of different roles,” said Sanchez. “If you talk about accountants
that play an internal audit role or advisory role, we see in many companies
internal audit playing a key role of assisting the organization with their
implementation of GDPR. For example, one of the requirements of GDPR is to
develop an inventory of all the processing activities. It’s called a Record of
Processing Activities, or a ROPA. Internal audit and the accounting people who
generally make up an internal audit function are uniquely positioned to be able
to assist the organization with developing that because internal auditors
generally have a very broad understanding of the organization. They’re very
process oriented and they have the skill sets and tools to do data flow maps. I
think internal audit in particular is very well suited to helping an
organization to go through this process.”
He
also sees a role for internal audit in evaluating whether a company is
complying with GDPR. “It’s not unlike auditing other regulations, going through
and assessing is the company following its policies and procedures,” said
Sanchez. “I think those are all activities that internal audit or accountants
working in a business consulting advisory type of model are very well suited
for assisting organizations.”
Accountants
might even be able to help with all those emails that have been hitting inboxes
recently. GDPR requires a lawful basis for processing of personal data by
companies, and in many cases companies have been updating their privacy
agreements while notifying customers about the changes.
“Organizations
that are subject to GDPR, those that are offering goods and services into
Europe, are going through and revamping their privacy policies,” said Sanchez.
“That’s why you see all these companies releasing new privacy statements and
privacy policies in the last couple of weeks. One of the requirements of GDPR
is that organizations have to have a legal basis for processing. That means that
there has to be a legitimate reason why the organization is allowed to use and
process the personal data on the European data subjects, so we also see a lot
of activity with organizations going through and updating consent language, or
documenting other legal bases of processing if they’re not using consent as the
basis of processing. I think that’s something accountants can help
organizations update their legal basis of processing and assist with the
documentation associated with that activity.”
Some
of the main requirements of GDPR include the right to access, which gives
people the right to obtain their data and to know how it’s being handled; the
right to rectification, allowing citizens to amend and correct their personal
data; and the right to erasure, also known as the right to be forgotten,
permitting subjects to request deletion of their related personal data.
Ready
or not, the GDPR takes effect Friday, so companies are scrambling now to comply
as best they can.
“The
European privacy authorities have all said there’s not going to be an
extension,” said Sanchez. “One of the privacy authorities stated that companies
have had two years to implement this. That was their two-year grace period, and
there’s not going to be any additional grace period, but I think what we’re
seeing in reality is many companies are not going to be 100 percent compliant
by the deadline, so this exercise of obtaining compliance is going to be an
ongoing activity.”
Many
businesses in the U.S. have never heard of GDPR or only heard about it
recently, so it’s not surprising the level of preparedness is low in this
country.
“My
experiences with companies in the United States is the awareness started
ramping up in late 2017,” Sanchez said Thursday. “Starting in early 2018, we saw
the acceleration of awareness, and companies are trying to rush through this.
But still a lot of organizations aren’t going to be compliant by tomorrow, and
we’re expecting to see the activity of organizations that are getting to
compliance continuing for many more months.”
Businesses
not only have to worry about their own compliance with the new data privacy
rules, but how well their business partners are complying as third parties who
handle their customers’ data.
“The
data controller is the organization that receives the data from the individual,
but all of the data processors, which could be vendors to the data controller,
all have to comply as well,” said Sanchez. “One of the things we’re seeing now
as well is every company is sending letters to every one of their vendors
asking them about their compliance with GDPR, asking them to sign privacy
addendums. You can imagine all of the different companies and all of the
different vendors — we’re talking about millions of these requests going around
right now — asking organizations to describe their controls or commit to comply
with GDPR. That effort alone is going to take a lot of time to evaluate all
those vendor relationships. That’s definitely one I’m seeing go past the
deadline for many companies.”
However,
companies that decide to ignore the new requirement could find themselves
facing heavy penalties. “The fines are enormous,” said Sanchez. “The European
authorities have the ability to fine up to 4 percent of global revenue. The
maximum fine is the greater of 20 million euros or 4 percent of global revenue.
That gets people’s attention. That can be a big number, and we do expect to see
the European authorities open investigations and actively enforce compliance.
That’s one of the things where there’s a little bit of wait and see as to what
happens starting tomorrow. The European authorities have hinted that they’re
intending to actively enforce GDPR.”
GDPR
Misconceptions
Robert
Cattanach, a partner at the international law firm Dorsey & Whitney and a
former trial attorney at the Justice Department, has been closely watching
developments with the GDPR and believes there are many misconceptions with it.
“Some
common misperceptions being heard around the U.S. and Canada include:
"If
I don’t have operations in Europe, it doesn’t apply. Wrong. Any U.S. company
offering goods or service to EU residents — i.e., anyone with a website — is
likely required to comply," Cattanach said in a statement.
“If
I am covered by the GDPR I have to appoint a Data Protection Officer (DPO) in
the EU. Wrong. A U.S. company’s obligation to appoint a DPO, or even a
designated representative, is a complex and highly fact-depedent analysis,”
Cattanach said.
"If
I am not covered by GDPR I don’t have to update my Privacy Policy. Wrong. A lot
has happened in the U.S. since companies started adopting boilerplate Privacy
Policies without really understanding what they were committing to do, and not
to do," Cattanach said. "Regardless of whether you are covered by
GDPR, basic principles of good information governance mandate a careful look at
your privacy policy and terms of use on your website. The biggest risk:
overstating who you share your data with. Virtually all websites employ
third-party data analytic services, which often open the door to opaque
gathering,mining, and trading of a person’s data in ways the website owner may
not understand at all — and often conflicts with commitments made to customers
and website visitors.”
"If
I’m a small to medium-sized U.S. company, there’s virtually zero chance of any
enforcement action against me so i can just wait until we understand better how
it’s all going to work. Maybe — maybe — right. EU regulators will likely target
the larger companies, especially U.S. tech companies, at first but GDPR allows
private citizens to lodge complaints, and even bring class actions,"
Cattanach said. "All it will take is one disgruntled customer or employee
whistle blower to spotlight someone who thought they could fly below the radar
for a few years. If your appetite for risk is voracious, you might avoid
detection for a while. But if you completely ignore GDPR and get caught, the
financial exposure to penalties and long-term scrutiny could be breathtaking.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




